The Demise of Subculture: How Cult Dressing Developed into Mainstream Tradition
Pleasure in Freedom of Expression
Past Netflix documentaries and newspaper headlines, within the context of style, “cult dressing” refers to a sartorial trope related to particular subcultures or underground actions, the place clothes selections are sometimes used as a type of insurrection, id or self-expression that’s distinct from mainstream style. These subcultures might embrace teams like punk, goth, grunge, skaters or various kinds that rejected standard style norms. Cult dressing is usually outlined by its exclusivity and uniqueness, typically showcasing a particular set of aesthetics — corresponding to do-it-yourself (DIY) style, obscure designer items or unconventional ensembles that sign membership in a particular cultural or social group. This type is normally adopted by those that wish to differentiate themselves from the mainstream, typically as a type of resistance or individuality.
As style turns into extra inclusive and accessible, customers at the moment are capable of specific their genuine selves with out the limitations that after saved sure kinds unique. This democratisation of style signifies that folks from all walks of life can discover pleasure in dressing uniquely, with out feeling restricted by mainstream style’s norms. The important thing concept is that these kinds have been as soon as uncommon, area of interest and inaccessible to the broader public, however as style turns into extra democratised by social media and collaborations between excessive style and mass-market manufacturers, these as soon as “cult” kinds are more and more absorbed into the mainstream, dropping a few of their distinctiveness and rebellious energy.
The Rise of Social Media and the Demise of Subcultural Significance
@cynicalneoprincess If final night time was something to go by I suppose I can anticipate a looot of Chappell Roan comparisons over the following few years. However I would like everybody to know I used to be doing the entire white face drag look earlier than I ever knew who she was 😭 . . . . . . . . . #fitcheck #altfashion #altmakeup #gothfashion #clubkid ♬ unique sound – ICONIC AUDIO
Vogue has at all times been a car for self-expression, a device to speak id and beliefs. For years, cult dressing — the hallmark of underground actions, area of interest subcultures and rebellious countercultures — was a bastion of inclusivity by way of exclusivity, an area the place private type was outlined by what was totally different from the mainstream, a subculture of people who discovered their very own sense of belonging amongst outsiders. In 2025, the panorama has shifted dramatically. Social media platforms — notably TikTok — have democratised style, enabling subcultures as soon as confined to the fringes to maneuver into the mainstream, the place their distinct kinds are appropriated, commodified and mass-marketed inflicting the traces between what’s “underground” and what’s business to blur. What was as soon as deemed “various” is now simply accessible to anybody with a cellphone and style has change into a extra collective, quickly altering expertise.
To many, the distinctive essence of subcultures that after outlined individuality has been commodified and marketed to the lots. As these kinds trickle all the way down to mass-market manufacturers and their customers, they finally change into mainstream traits dropping the very essence of what made them particular. What was as soon as a logo of authenticity — from punk’s security pins and flannel shirts to the streetwear born from skate tradition — turns into diluted when packaged for revenue. This ends in the erosion of the authenticity these actions as soon as held, resulting in a way of disillusionment within the pleasure of dressing and the expression of being “uniquely you”. The “proliferation” of those once-unique kinds forces us — as style customers — to confront the dichotomy: can adopting parts of a subculture nonetheless enable area for true individuality? If not, does this disillusionment have an effect on the very concept of what it means to be “uniquely you”?
The Reconfiguration of Vogue Tradition
@noctez.collective blowin’ bubbles… #y2k #outfitinspo #aesthetic #y2kfashion #fyp ♬ son unique – ∞
The emergence of TikTok as a worldwide cultural power has reworked the way in which many devour style. With TikTok’s algorithm-driven discovery instruments, style traits can explode and evolve in a matter of hours. Now not do people have to belong to a particular subculture to achieve visibility and the “cult” facet of “cult dressing” is now diluted. Within the age of TikTok, area of interest traits corresponding to normcore, Y2K aesthetics and even particular clothes manufacturers related to subcultures are consumed and reworked by tens of millions. Whereas this stage of visibility is empowering, it additionally raises the query of whether or not subcultures can retain their authenticity as soon as they change into commercially viable.
Normcore — which initially stood out for its embrace of simplicity as a type of non-conformity — rapidly advanced right into a mainstream pattern. What began as a rejection of ostentation turned mass-marketed and adopted by main retailers, making it accessible whereas sustaining its roots in minimalism. This shift highlights how subcultures — even these rooted in resistance to traits — can discover themselves co-opted by the very industries they as soon as challenged.
Equally, Cottagecore — a mode born from a romanticised, rural way of life that rejects modernity — attracts inspiration from classic, rural aesthetics with a countercultural edge. Initially a distinct segment, it has seen a surge in reputation, pushed partially by platforms like TikTok and Etsy, and compounded to mainstream tradition by the recognition of the “Trad Spouse” way of life pattern. This motion — as soon as outlined by its “cultish” high quality — has grown to see collaborations between indie manufacturers and mass-market retailers like City Outfitters, blurring the road between underground and mainstream enchantment.
The Y2K aesthetic — rooted in nostalgia for the late Nineteen Nineties and early 2000s — exemplifies how traits are revived with new depth within the digital age. Outlined by metallics, uncovered underwear waistbands over dishevelled, low-rise denims and daring logos, this pattern has exploded throughout social media and into the style mainstream (re-energised by Diesel, who one might argue was a pioneer of the pattern within the early 2000s, showcasing the cyclical nature of style as kinds make their means again into the highlight, typically evolving but remaining rooted of their origins), revealing the facility of collective reminiscence and viral affect in reshaping previous kinds for immediately’s viewers.
Lastly, streetwear — which as soon as emerged from skate, hip-hop, and punk subcultures — has ascended from its underground roots to change into a dominant power in international style. Manufacturers like Supreme and Off-White, which have been initially a part of countercultural actions, now stand on the forefront of excessive style, demonstrating how kinds born in insurrection can redefine what is taken into account mainstream. This shift underscores the fluid nature of style, the place the traces between subcultures and business success proceed to blur. There’s additionally a component of nostalgia, cultural relevance and timing at play. Cottagecore, for instance, aligns with a collective want for simplicity and a return to nature amidst digital overwhelm. Equally, the resurgence of Y2K aesthetics faucets into nostalgia — advertising and marketing it as a type of self-expression, however typically decreasing it to a technique to commodify reminiscences.
Redefining Individuality in a Collective Vogue Tradition
Uniqlo Collab with Marni (left) and Jil Sander (proper)
Some of the notable markers of this shift is the elevated frequency of collaborations between avant-garde designers and mass-market manufacturers. Labels like Uniqlo, H&M and even fast-fashion titan Zara have lengthy partnered with high-end designers to make their collections accessible to the lots. Designers with cult followings corresponding to Jil Sander, Comme des Garçons and Alexander Wang have contributed to traces that convey excessive style into reasonably priced retail areas. This merging of excessive and low style serves to additional dissolve the boundaries that after outlined the 2. These partnerships make luxurious design extra accessible but in addition problem the idea of style as an expression of exclusivity. When cutting-edge designs can be found at one’s native Uniqlo, it turns into troublesome to say that these items — as soon as markers of individuality — are really distinctive anymore.
In a time the place digital traits dictate what’s “in” and quick style accelerates manufacturing and distribution, private expression in style has change into extra about what the buyer can entry than about being “uniquely you”. The digital age has additionally accelerated the pace at which these traits evolve, making it more durable for anyone type to stay “cult” for lengthy. The people who originated the pattern or belonged to those subcultures, lose the enjoyment of being “uniquely you” and shortly transfer on to the following pattern. Subcultural style was as soon as about establishing an id by distinctive selections — garments that represented a particular perception, group or concept. At the moment, that course of has been shortened into digestible moments: a TikTok problem, an influencer partnership or a viral meme. The notion of “individuality” is now framed inside the context of a collective cultural second. The problem customers face is how they intend to protect individuality in a society the place cultural traits really feel more and more orchestrated and the way manufacturers market this to customers whereas nonetheless leveraging on market traits and sustaining revenue margins.
Luxurious Labels, Cult Followings & Designer Reshuffle
One other component of cult dressing in luxurious style strikes away from the underground rebellions and as a substitute faucets into a wholly totally different subculture — one constructed round an aspirational way of life outlined by exclusivity. Designers like Jonathan Anderson and Demna faucet into this area of interest by creating collections that appeal to a particular sort of shopper — one who values individuality but in addition seeks to belong to an unique group. These collections embody a novel intersection of non-public type and aspirational standing.
Jonathan Anderson’s tenure at Loewe — marked by surreal and sometimes daring designs — pushed the boundaries of what was historically accepted in excessive style and gave rise to a type of cult dressing that resonated with underground and avant-garde actions. Anderson’s use of unconventional shapes, vibrant colors and sudden supplies introduced pleasure in freedom of expression, aligning with the themes of individuality and insurrection that cult style represents. Jonathan Anderson’s inventive path at Loewe exemplified one other component of cult dressing — pushing the boundaries of what was thought-about “trendy” and mainstream. His work introduced seemingly “outlandish” aesthetics to the forefront, typically blurring the traces between excessive style and artwork. Loewe’s daring collections — with their surreal designs, outsized silhouettes and unconventional therapy of supplies — resonated with a distinct segment, cult-like following that embraced the rebellious spirit of individuality and avant-garde style. As Anderson leaves Loewe in 2025, this departure alerts the tip of an period the place cult aesthetics and non-conventional magnificence have been embraced by a luxurious style home. His departure raises questions on the way forward for outlandish aesthetics within the mainstream, as excessive style more and more aligns with digital virality and quick style traits.
Below Demna’s path, Balenciaga cultivated a cult following, because of his subversive designs that always blurred the traces between excessive style and streetwear. His work resonated with a brand new technology looking for to problem style’s conventional codes. The model’s daring, boundary-pushing method — coupled with its means to supply each exclusivity (by excessive worth factors) and accessibility (by beloved staple items just like the Triple S sneaker) — turned Balenciaga right into a cultural phenomenon. Regardless of what some might contemplate a controversial tenure, Demna’s departure from Balenciaga marks the tip of an period through which his distinctive imaginative and prescient reworked the model into a logo of each underground insurrection and aspirational luxurious. His affect on Balenciaga’s evolution — from its sensationalist product releases to its cult-like enchantment — was as divisive because it was advertising and marketing magic.
It is usually attention-grabbing to notice that Gucci — in the course of the Alessandro Michele years — equally honed in by itself legacy of cult standing, together with his gender-bending, eclectic, maximalist designs that redefined the Maison’s heritage, breaking down conventional notions of menswear leading to collections that resonated deeply with countercultural actions. As Demna transitions to Gucci, it will likely be intriguing to see how he navigates and meets the calls for of Gucci customers.
For extra on the most recent in type and style reads, click on right here.
