Whereas it’s regular for airways to have conduct and look requirements for workers, this must be one of many stranger notices we’ve seen.
PIA tells cabin crew to be extra presentable
Pakistan Worldwide Airways (PIA) appears to have some points with how crews are dressing throughout layovers, when not in uniform. PIA’s Common Supervisor of Flight Providers suggests that the way in which that cabin crew are dressing is leaving a “poor impression” and “portrays a damaging picture” of the airline.
In a memo to workers, the next issues are introduced up:
“It has been noticed with nice concern that just a few cabin crew have a tendency to decorate casually whereas touring intercity, staying in lodges and visiting numerous suffices. Such dressing leaves a poor impression on the viewer and portrays a damaging picture of not solely the person but additionally of the organisation.”
The memo goes on to ask cabin crew to “costume correctly” in formal plain garments over “correct undergarments.” It’s additionally acknowledged that “the clothes worn by women and men needs to be in accordance with our cultural and nationwide morals.”
Grooming officers on the airline have been informed to observe crews, and report again if there are any deviations from these insurance policies.
This memo appears… oddly particular?
Admittedly airways across the globe have totally different requirements on the subject of how crews should behave off the aircraft. In some circumstances that is particular to how workers should behave whereas in uniform and never on the aircraft (like at airports), whereas in different circumstances it entails how they need to behave when not in uniform (like at layover lodges).
This memo from PIA jogs my memory of that Pan Am coaching video about how workers ought to behave at lodges, as they’re nonetheless representing the airline.
Even so, I’m a bit confused by PIA’s memo. The airline is asking workers to decorate in “formal plain garments” when on layovers. Possibly that’s not meant so actually, however… why? In the event that they’re going to the resort health club or on a stroll in a heat local weather, are “formal plain garments” actually essential?
And naturally that’s the much less unusual level right here — the a lot stranger factor is the request to put on undergarments. This leads me to solely two potential conclusions:
- Have there truthfully been repeated incidents that contain crews not sporting undergarments, and that in some way getting again to administration?
- Is somebody at PIA just a bit bit pervy, and that’s mirrored in what they’ve chosen to give attention to in a memo?
I imply, we’ve seen loads of airways with a lot greater customer support requirements than PIA write memos to workers about look, although I don’t ever recall undergarments particularly being referenced. Hmmm…
Pakistan Worldwide Airways has reminded cabin crew that they should costume appropriately even when not in uniform. They’ve been informed to put on formal plain garments over “correct undergarments,” which positive makes me marvel what precisely the backstory is that prompted this memo to be written.
What do you make of this PIA memo to cabin crew?
(Tip of the hat to Paddle Your Personal Kanoo)