China Japanese Boeing 737 Crash: Thriller Or Cowl-Up?
Right this moment marks the 2 yr anniversary of a China Japanese Boeing 737’s deadly crash in China, killing all 132 folks onboard, together with 123 passengers and 9 crew members. Regardless of the period of time that has handed, investigators declare they nonetheless don’t have any clue what occurred. The query is, do they actually not know, or do they simply not need to admit it?
Chinese language regulators don’t have any leads with China Japanese 737 crash
On March 21, 2022, China Japanese flight MU5735 was scheduled to function from Kunming (KMG) to Guangzhou (CAN). The 665-mile flight was operated by a Boeing 737-800 with the license plate B-1791, first delivered to the airline in 2015.
The flight began routinely, however shortly earlier than the plane was scheduled to start out its descent, the plane entered a sudden nosedive, whereby it descended from 29,100 ft to 7,400 ft. The plane briefly leveled off, climbed to 9,225 ft, after which entered a nosedive as soon as once more, till it crashed right into a mountain. This complete state of affairs took beneath two minutes, with a most descent fee of over 32,000 ft per minute.
Additionally take into account that all through this whole incident, there was no communication between pilots and air site visitors controllers. Whereas the precedence is all the time on aviating over speaking, that’s nonetheless fairly uncommon.
Suffice it to say that this was a terrifying accident, and I really feel horribly for what the passengers onboard endured. The Civil Aviation Administration of China (CAAC) has been in control of the investigation into the accident, although hasn’t had a lot luck with really figuring out the foundation explanation for the accident… or so it claims.
On the 2 yr anniversary of the accident, regulators have issued an up to date report on their progress with the crash investigation. The CAAC states that this crash is “very sophisticated and uncommon,” although has dominated out quite a lot of elements. Earlier than the crash, there have been no abnormalities with plane management instructions or with radio communication. Moreover, there was no unhealthy climate within the space, the aircraft wasn’t carrying any harmful items, and the pilots had been absolutely licensed, had adequate relaxation, and many others.
The CAAC states that it’s persevering with to analyze this incident, and can proceed to hold out experimental verification and trigger evaluation, and launch related data based mostly on the progress of the investigation.
In actuality, this newest replace gives little or no new data in comparison with what we knew inside weeks of the accident.
Do Chinese language regulators actually not know what occurred?
One of many causes that aviation is so secure is as a result of we be taught one thing from each accident, and make updates to make sure one thing related doesn’t occur sooner or later. Most aviation regulators across the globe do an unimaginable job with investigating accidents, and making our skies safer.
One actually can’t assist however marvel what’s happening right here. Do regulators in China actually not know what occurred, or are they protecting it up? Understand that shortly after the incident, a US official instructed that the accident was intentional, and that somebody made the management column enter that induced a nosedive.
All the pieces factors to that being the case. Planes don’t simply instantly go right into a nosedive for no cause, particularly with no proof of a technical fault. Moreover, it doesn’t look like any management column was jammed, based mostly on the truth that the aircraft briefly leveled off, after which as soon as once more entered a nosedive.
If this was intentional, the logical query is who induced this. Was it one of many pilots? Did another person take management of the plane? It’s fascinating to have a look at who was within the cockpit, as there have been three pilots:
- The captain was a 32-year-old who had 6,709 flight hours
- The primary officer was a 59-year-old who had 31,769 flight hours, who was a flight teacher for China Japanese and educated greater than 100 captains, and who had been awarded the honorary title of “Meritorious Pilot” of civil aviation in 2011
- The second officer was a 27-year-old who had a complete of 556 flight hours, however he was simply observing the cockpit and was being educated, and wasn’t really flying
Taking a look at these three pilots, there’s one one who stands out. The primary officer was actually certainly one of China’s most skilled pilots, had obtained awards for his piloting, and was a coaching captain… but he was now solely a primary officer on the Boeing 737?!
It’s my understanding that shortly earlier than the accident, he had been demoted from captain to first officer, for having failed some simulator checks (which is regarding in its personal proper, when you think about he was a coaching captain). This clearly comes with a significant pay minimize, and that may put monetary stress on anybody.
Now, that doesn’t essentially imply he was the one who deliberately crashed the aircraft, although it makes you marvel if there could have been extra clues pointing to that. There are all types of rumors concerning uncommon habits from the primary officer within the days main as much as the accident, although regulators haven’t said something publicly about that.
I’ve to think about that the Chinese language authorities is aware of much more than it’s saying. Understand that China Japanese is majority owned by the Chinese language authorities. It doesn’t look good for any airline when a crash occurs resulting from one thing like a pilot deliberately downing the aircraft.
The opposite factor is that regulators can’t simply lie and declare there was some plane fault, since clearly Boeing and different international investigators would search verification of that. So it virtually looks as if the CAAC is making an attempt to comb this beneath the rug by being as obscure as doable, hoping that ultimately folks simply cease caring.
Backside line
It’s the 2 yr anniversary of the crash of a Chinese language Japanese Boeing 737, whereby the aircraft plunged right into a mountain in beneath two minutes, tragically resulting in the loss of life of 132 folks. Even two years later, investigators in China declare they don’t have any clue what occurred, although notice that nothing was mistaken with the aircraft, the radio communication, the climate, or the cargo.
All the pieces is pointing in a single path, but the CAAC is doing little or no to acknowledge that. I’m curious if we’ll ever be taught extra about what actually occurred.
What do you suppose — will we ever be taught the reality of what occurred with China Japanese flight 5735?